So true rick, couldn't agree more. People are jealous so they mock it Username checks out. Edit: And a completely new engine too? How do you know? Because you watch and read? Other projects? Such as wasting hours and hours on this site with rubbish replies Interesting comparison. Has this car been instrumentally tested? Which decade of hypercars was faster: s, s, or s? Dear Hoppelmoppel Reply Glen 6m ago frankly I think all car racing would be more exciting if they threw a deer out onto the track every third or seventh lap.
Reply 1 1 reply. Cauf40f50 1y ago In la sarthe a f1 would lose to a lmp1 by a very huge margin. Reply 5. Cauf40f50 1y ago In a circuit like spa f1 beats lmp but in le mans even a lmp2 would beat a f1. Reply 5k. Chad 1y ago LMP cars may have quicker acceleration due to F1 sporting regulations but they're nowhere near the fastest accelerating. Reply 4. BMC 3y ago F1 were 13 seconds faster around Spa in There is too much incorrect data on this page that gives an erroneous impression about the capabilities of this car.
Therefore, some points need to be corrected:. It looks very impressive considering that there were 3 people in the car, and laptime is in the same league with C6 ZR-1 and GT-R. But in fact, the track underwent significant changes in and these times are not comparable.
Therefore, we can assume that in a modern configuration, F1 lap time would be approximately on par with the Civic Type R FK2, which in general is also quite impressive for a car with two passengers on board. The tested car, which showed a faster time than Enzo, was not a stock car. Perhaps F1 LM could make it, but for a standart F1, the numbers are unrealistic.
F1 is a very light supercar with a powerful engine, all modern supercars weigh more than kg. Looking back to this page, I don't think the F1 that did Maybe it had a tune. This supercar is such an incredible machine. Easily one of the greatest true supercar ever made. Still one of the best looking supercar. Maybe gearing? Inline 6 rules 5y ago. FastestLaps 5y ago. I find this funny. How do you calculate something like that I guess they don't want the bad imagine for the brand, but it's not like other supercars don't crash or that there aren't plenty of pictures with crashed McLaren's, Ferraris etc around anyway.
Braking from to 0 takes only ft,that would put it only 11ft more than Enzo's braking which is the only thing superior it has to F1 not including steering. And as for handling auto car also praised it by saying it has phenomenal handling. But I am full aware that handling and not to mention brakes and tires have come a long way since then so F1 can't cope up with modern cars.
I still find it amazing that it is still considered a good benchmark. Until rain turned the Russian Grand Prix on its head in the closing stages, Lando Norris was set to convert his first Formula 1 pole position into a maiden win.
But having recovered well from being shuffled back at the start, Hamilton and his Mercedes team called the changing conditions spot-on for a landmark th F1 victory.
At the Italian Grand Prix Daniel Ricciardo turned around a troubled F1 season and, in F2, Oscar Piastri demonstrated once again that he is a potential star of the future.
Tickets Subscribe. Sign in. Registration Sign in Facebook connect. All me. Download your apps. All rights reserved. By: Anna Duxbury. Co-author: Joe Holding. Jun 11, , PM. Related video. Previous article Horner: Perez "ahead of expectation", but no rush for new deal. Next article Hamilton: I don't understand why F1 cars are getting heavier. Load comments. How fast is an F1 car? Formula 1. More Anna Duxbury. W Series. Jul 27, Formula 1 Formula 1. Historics Historics.
Subscribe to PLUS. Posted 22 September - Turns out this is like asking for the blueprints of the Cosworth V But by comparing the R1's power and weight with other race cars we've tested and incorporating off-the-record tidbits of information, we estimate that the R1 could cover the standing quarter-mile in about nine seconds at mph with appropriate gearing. Heaven only knows how quick it was. I also belive they built an experimental flat 16 motor based on that I wonder if the dyno could even record an accurate measurement, if the story is true.
Originally posted by Mark Beckman About 10 years ago an English mag did acceleration tests of various race vehicles including an F1, Martin Schanka's spelling? Escort Rallycross car with 4 wheel drive and a reputed hp whipped all of them. Posted 23 September - Posted 24 September - Posted 25 September - Posted 26 September - Originally posted by slipstream I have a basic Question.
Or is it a combination of Both? Posted 27 September - All rights reserved. Community Forum Software by IP. Javascript Disabled Detected You currently have javascript disabled.
Please log in to reply. How Accurate do you think a 8. Road and Track published a quarter mile time of about 9 seconds flat. This car had about bhp, enourmous Goodyear slicks and no traction control. I'm guessing today's cars could do the quarter in about 7. I believe Car and Driver tested the Jaguar a few years back but I don't have the article Does anyone know the true numbers?
Posted 22 September - mp4, I would tend to agree with you. I'm sort of surprised. Maybe they should have tried Monza trim. You're only grip limited at the lower speeds when the wings don't make any downforce anyway Posted 22 September - Over the years I have seen various tests and they mostly came up with low 9's pre Turbo era, mostly Cosworths of course.
0コメント